Long Line Sepsis - Neonatal |
Publication: 01/09/2005 |
Next review: 09/03/2026 |
Clinical Guideline |
CURRENT |
ID: 654 |
Approved By: Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group |
Copyright© Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2023 |
This Clinical Guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals within Leeds unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline for the management of Neonatal Long Line Sepsis
Summary Long Line Sepsis - Neonatal |
Definition Catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) are defined as:
Investigations
Treatment
Antimicrobial
See full guideline for organism-specific recommendations and duration of therapy. Duration of treatment Switch to oral agent(s) |
Treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||
The definitive treatment for infection arising from a CVC is removal of the CVC and thus the source of infection. However, CVC are frequently precious assets and should be removed if the risk of leaving the catheter in situ outweighs the risk of removal and when other venous access is available. Removal of a line should always be discussed with the consultant. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Antimicrobial Treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||
Please refer to E-Meds protocol for specific dosing and therapeutic dose monitoring |
||||||||||||||||||||
Duration of Treatment | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment Duration1
Table 1. Length of treatment of central venous catheter related sepsis.
When to Remove the Line Central venous catheters are frequently precious assets and should be removed only:
Where recommended, the line should be removed unless the risk of removal is considered greater than the risk of not. Line removal is strongly recommended in the following situations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment Failure | ||||||||||||||||||||
Please contact Microbiology if the patient is not responding to the recommended antimicrobial regimens. |
Provenance
Record: | 654 |
Objective: |
|
Clinical condition: | Suspected long line sepsis |
Target patient group: | Infants with percutaneous and tunnelled central venous catheter |
Target professional group(s): | Secondary Care Doctors Secondary Care Nurses |
Adapted from: |
Evidence base
- Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2009; 49(1): 1–45
- Sandoe JAT, Ian R. Witherden IR, Cove JH, Heritage J, Wilcox MH. Correlation between enterococcal biofilm formation in vitro and medical-device-related infection potential in vivo. J Med Microbiol, 2003; 52:547-550
- Lee JH. Catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care units. Korean J Pediatr. 2011;54(9):363-7. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2011.54.9.363.
- Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures, Lancet, 1999, 354:1071-7
- Catton JA, Dobbins BM, Kite P, et al. In situ diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of quantitative culture, differential time to positivity, and endoluminal brushing. Critical Care Medicine, 2005: 33(4):787-791. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000157968.98476.F3
Approved By
Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group
Document history
LHP version 2.1
Related information
Not supplied
Equity and Diversity
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is committed to ensuring that the way that we provide services and the way we recruit and treat staff reflects individual needs, promotes equality and does not discriminate unfairly against any particular individual or group.