Plastic surgery in adults - Guideline for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis |
Publication: 23/12/2009 |
Next review: 27/06/2023 |
Clinical Guideline |
CURRENT |
ID: 1774 |
Approved By: Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group |
Copyright© Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2020 |
This Clinical Guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals within Leeds unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline for antimicrobial prophylaxis during plastic surgery in adults
- Summary table of routine recommendations
- Background information
- Special antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations
1. Summary table of routine recommendations
It is the responsibility of the surgical team to prescribe the prophylactic antibiotics, and the anaesthetist to ensure they have been given within one hour of incision.
Procedure |
Recommendation for antimicrobial prophylaxis |
Evidence level |
Aim of prophylaxis |
NNT |
Antimicrobial dose/route/timing |
||||
Routine* |
MRSA risk* or true penicillin allergy |
||||||||
Ulcerated lesion |
Recommended |
D |
Reduction in wound infection |
Flucloxacillin |
Doxycycline |
||||
Ulcerated lesion |
Recommended |
D |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Breast surgery |
Recommended |
A,B |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Breast reconstruction with or without implants |
Recommended |
A,B |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Breast expanders |
Recommended |
C |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Hand trauma open |
Recommended |
A,B |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Upper limb - elective/closed trauma >2 hours operation length +/- implants (metal/ silicone) |
Highly recommended |
A,B |
Reduction in deep wound infection |
38 |
Flucloxacillin |
Teicoplanin |
|||
Axillary dissection |
Recommended |
C |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Groin dissection |
Recommended |
C |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Pressure sores – debridement under anaesthetic |
Recommended. If septic, not for prophylaxis but treat infection |
D. |
Reduction in wound infection |
Flucloxacillin |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Skin grafts |
Not recommended |
A |
Nil |
Nil |
|||||
Burn excision |
Recommended |
D |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Sentinel node biopsy |
Not recommended |
A,B |
Nil |
Nil |
|||||
Soft tissue tumour |
Recommended |
D |
Reduction in wound infection |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Open / compound fracture (including unsalvageable limb amputation) |
|||||||||
Initial debridement* |
Highly recommended. |
A2,3 C12 |
Wound infection |
14 |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Skeletal stabilisation & definitive wound closure* |
Highly recommended |
A2,3 C12 |
Wound infection |
14 |
Teicoplanin |
||||
Head and neck - oncology |
Recommended |
B |
Reduction in wound infection |
6 |
Co-amoxiclav |
Teicoplanin |
|||
Head and neck- benign |
Not recommended |
B |
Nil |
Nil |
IBW = Ideal body weight (kg). IBW = Height in cm - 100, or see table below.
* Give additional peri-operative doses if procedure >4 hours long or if patient undergoes total body volume transfusion: Flucloxacillin after 3 hours, Co-amoxiclav
after 4 hours, Metronidazole
after 8 hours. Do NOT give another dose Teicoplanin
or Vancomycin
. Gentamicin dose to be repeated if patient undergoes total volume transfusion.
Teicoplanin & Gentamicin are incompatible, so ALWAYS flush between administrations. Teicoplanin
takes up to 15 minutes to reconstitute so allow time for preparation.
Gentamicin dosing in adult male >16years |
Gentamicin dosing in adult female > 16 years |
|||||||
Use height to select |
IBW |
Use ABW if |
Gentamicin |
Use height to select |
IBW |
Use ABW if |
Gentamicin dose (mg) |
|
6’ 3” (1.9m) + |
84.5 |
78 to 82 |
160 |
6’ 3” (1.9m) + |
79.5 |
78 to 82 |
160 |
|
6’ 2” (1.88m) |
82.2 |
6’ 2” (1.88m) |
77.2 |
72 to 77 |
150 |
|||
6’ 1” (1.85m) |
79.9 |
6’ 1” (1.85m) |
74.9 |
|||||
6’ (1.82m) |
77.6 |
72 to 77 |
150 |
6’ (1.82m) |
72.6 |
|||
5’ 11” (1.8m) |
75.3 |
5’ 11” (1.8m) |
70.3 |
66 to 71 |
140 |
|||
5’ 10” (1.78m) |
73 |
5’ 10” (1.78m) |
68 |
|||||
5’ 9” (1.75m) |
70.7 |
66 to 71 |
140 |
5’ 9” (1.75m) |
65.7 |
60 to 65 |
130 |
|
5’ 8” (1.72m) |
68.4 |
5’ 8” (1.72m) |
63.4 |
|||||
5’ 7” (1.7m) |
66.1 |
5’ 7” (1.7m) |
61.1 |
|||||
5’ 6” (1.67m) |
63.8 |
60 to 65 |
130 |
5’ 6” (1.67m) |
58.8 |
55 to 59 |
120 |
|
5’ 5” (1.65m) |
61.5 |
5’ 5” (1.65m) |
56.5 |
|||||
5’ 4” (1.62m) |
59.2 |
55 to 59 |
120 |
5’ 4” (1.62m) |
54.2 |
|||
5’ 3” (1.6m) |
56.9 |
5’ 3” (1.6m) |
51.9 |
49 to 54 |
100 |
|||
5’ 2” (1.57m) |
54.6 |
5’ 2” (1.57m) |
49.6 |
|||||
5’ 1” (1.55m) |
52.3 |
49 to 54 |
100 |
5’ 1” (1.55m) |
47.3 |
43 to 48 |
90 |
|
5’ (1.52m) or under |
50 |
5’ (1.52m) or under |
45 |
2. Background information
The aim of antimicrobial prophylaxis when used in plastic surgery is a reduction in surgical site infection (SSI) - a potentially debilitating and occasionally life-threatening complication.
The continued presence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Trust and the ongoing problem of Clostridium difficile infection have prompted a review of surgical prophylaxis. It is appropriate to use a single pre-operative dose of prophylaxis in most situations to reduce the risks related to antimicrobial use while gaining maximum benefit from prophylaxis (NICE, SIGN).
These guidelines should be applicable to the majority of patients. Where the recommendations in these guidelines do not seem appropriate for a particular patient, the surgeon is advised to discuss the case with a microbiologist.
3. Special antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations
Infection at the site of surgery can cause significant morbidity in reconstructive surgery patients.
Most commonly a SSI will cause a wound discharge with delayed wound healing and poor scarring. This is itself can have a detrimental effect on the psychological and physical outcome for a patient having reconstructive surgery to improve form and /or function.
However, with more severe wound infections patients have lengthier hospitals stays and may require further surgery to deal with the infection and it consequences on their wound and general well being.
The organism responsible for SSI are generally endogenous to the patient (i.e on their, skin, intestines, nasal) sometimes however there are exogenous (from surrounding people / objects).
The most common organism responsible for SSI in reconstructive surgery is Staphylococcus aureus. The number of micro organisms needed to cause an SSI is fewer in the presence of an implant (metal/ silicone) which are often used in reconstructive and hand surgery.
The patient population in plastic and reconstructive surgery is often elderly which immediately places them at higher risk of SSI. Associated with this they often have co morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, immunosuppression, malnutrition and peripheral vascular disease.
The aim of prophylactic antibiotics is to reduce the number of microorganisms which can contaminate the surgical wound at the time of surgery,. This along with careful tissue handling will decrease the risk of post operative infection.
In reconstructive surgery the site of surgery is often variable and in free tissue transfer there may be two or more distant surgical sites thus the antibiotics chosen for prophylaxis must be considered carefully.
For open fractures, the guidance from the British orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons Standard for Trauma (2009)12 will be followed but peri-operative gentamicin will be replaced by ciprofloxacin due to the high incidence of post-operative renal impairment in severe trauma patients.
These guidelines are to act as a reference for the more frequent procedures that are undertaken in our speciality. If there are patients who do not “fit any of the boxes” then more specific advice can be obtained from a consultant microbiologist.
|
Provenance
Record: | 1774 |
Objective: | |
Clinical condition: | Plastic surgery in adults |
Target patient group: | All adults |
Target professional group(s): | Pharmacists Secondary Care Doctors |
Adapted from: |
Evidence base
References
- Gemmell CG Gemmell CG, Edwards DI, Fraise AP, Gould FK, Ridgway GL, Warren RE, et al. Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK. 2006. p. 589-608
- SIGN. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network Publication Number 104. Ed Leaper D, Collier M, Evans D, Farrington M, Gibbs E, Gould K, et al.
- NICE Clinical Guideline 74: Surgical site infection: prevention and treatment of surgical site infection. In: health NCcfwac, editor.: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Press; 2008.
- Simo R, French G. Current opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006 April;14(2):55-61 The use of prophylactic antibiotics in Head and Neck oncology surgery
- Hoffman RD, Adams BD. Hand Clin 1998 Nov;14(4):657-66. The role of antibiotics in the management of elective and post traumatic hand surgery
- Platt AJ, Page RE. J Hand Surg Br.1995oct;20(5):685-90 Post-operative infection following hand surgery. Guidelines for antibiotic use.
- Landes G, Harris PGet al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2008 Nov;61(11):1347-56. Prevention of surgical site infection and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing habits in plastic surgery.
- Throckmorton AD, Boughey JC et al. Ann Surg oncology.2009 Sept;16(9):2464-9. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotics and surgical site infection rates in breast surgery patients
- Ahmadi AH, Cohen BE, Shayani P. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jul;116(1):126-31. A prospective study of antibiotic efficacy in preventing infection in reduction mammaplasty
- Whittaker JP, Nancarrow JD, Sterne GD J Hand Surg.BR 2005 May:30(2):162-7 The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean incised hand injuries : a prospective randomized placebo controlled double blind trial.
- Ichikawa S, Ishihara M, Okazaki T et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jun; 42(6):1002-7; Prospective study of antibiotic protocols for managing surgical site infections in children.
- British orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons Standard for Trauma (2009)
Evidence level (A,B,C, D)
A. Meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials/systematic reviews of RCTs
B. Robust experimental or observational studies
C. Expert consensus.
D. LTHT Consensus (no national guidelines exist, guidelines from different learned bodies contradict each other, or no evidence exists)
Approved By
Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group
Document history
LHP version 1.0
Related information
Not supplied
Equity and Diversity
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is committed to ensuring that the way that we provide services and the way we recruit and treat staff reflects individual needs, promotes equality and does not discriminate unfairly against any particular individual or group.