Community Acquired Rhinosinusitis ( Sinusitis ) in Adults |
Publication: 24/07/2009 |
Next review: 23/07/2024 |
Clinical Guideline |
CURRENT |
ID: 1726 |
Approved By: Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group |
Copyright© Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2021 |
This Clinical Guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals within Leeds unless otherwise stated. |
Guideline for Management of Community-Acquired Rhinosinusitis (Sinusitis) in Adults
|
Summary Community Acquired Rhinosinusitis ( Sinusitis ) in Adults |
||||||||||||
History Major criteria:
Minor criteria:
AND with worsening symptoms after 5 days (having initial improved) OR persistent symptoms 10 days after onset. Assess if:
Examination
Investigations
Non-Antimicrobial Management Antimicrobial treatment
*Linezolid Duration of treatment 10 days Treatment failure |
Background |
Rhinitis and sinusitis usually coexist and are concurrent in most individuals thus the correct terminology is now rhinosinusitis. Rhinosinusitis is defined as an inflammatory condition affecting the nose and paranasal sinuses. It can be caused by infection or allergy. It is a prevalent and important cause of ill health accounting for 15% to 21% of all adult outpatient prescriptions for antibiotics1, 2. Only infective causes are considered in this guideline. The paranasal sinuses are lined with ciliated pseudostratified epithelium, which is not normally colonized by bacteria despite being directly connected to the nasal cavity. The paranasal sinuses are cleared by mucociliary transport through small openings in the lateral nasal wall; the oseomeatal complex. The mechanism for maintaining this sterile environment is unknown but is likely to involve a combination of a patent osteomeatal complex, mucociliary clearance, mucosal and systemic immunity3. Rhinosinusitis can be classified according to the site of acquisition (hospital or community), the immune status of the host, the aetiology (bacterial, viral, fungal) and the duration of illness2. More practical, in terms of subsequent management is the distinction between: 1. acute rhinosinusitis, in which symptoms have been present for less than 12 weeks and settle spontaneously or with a single course of antimicrobial therapy or after surgical intervention. 2. Persisting rhinosinusitis, in which symptoms have been present for over 12 weeks or have failed a previous course of antimicrobial therapy 3. Complicated rhinosinusitis in which sinusitis is present together with any of its recognized complications (orbital cellulitis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, subdural empyema, brain abscess, severe sepsis/septic shock). The distinction between hospital acquired (usually defined as that developing >72 hours after admission) and community-acquired infection is relevant to the likely causative organism. Classification according to patient risk group such as the immunocompetence of the host is also relevant to the likely infecting pathogens and approach to therapy. Acute community-acquired rhinosinusitis can affect adults of any age but young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 are most commonly affected. Sinus disease is an inherent part of the common cold syndrome, i.e. a high proportion of patients with a “common cold” have viral rhinosinusitis. In this situation cilia can fail to move sinus material to the ostium, local swelling causes occlusion and clearance of sinus material is impaired, resulting in symptoms which usually settle in less than 10 days. Bacterial infection of the sinus may follow an acute viral infection typically with increasing symptoms after 5 days or persistent symptoms beyond day 10. Bacterial sinusitis may also occur as a result of direct spread from a periodontal source of infection.2 Respiratory viruses (e.g. coronavirus, rhinovirus) are the most common cause of rhinosinusitis. The most common bacterial causes of rhinosinusitis in adults are Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae with other Streptococcus species (beta and alpha haemolytic including Streptococcus anginosus group sometimes called “milleri”), Moraxella catarrhalis, anaerobes and Staphylococcus aureus accounting for most other cases. Fungi rarely cause acute community acquired sinusitis. 1, 4 There is a great potential for inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing for many acute upper respiratory tract infections because of the prevalence of self-limiting viral infections. It is estimated that only 0.5% to 2% of viral rhinosinusitis is complicated by bacterial infection which is usually mild and also self limiting. Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis probably affects 1 in 10 people at some point in their lives. A UK general practice can expect to see about 250 cases of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis every 10,000 person-years. The problem of choosing an appropriate antimicrobial agent, when one is indicated, is exacerbated by the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among common pathogens.5, 6 Patients with rhinosinusitis and brain abscesses should be managed according to LTHT guidelines for the management of brain abscesses in addition to ENT surgery input. Patients with orbital complications of rhinosinusitis LTHT guidelines for the management of orbital cellulitis in addition to ENT surgery input. |
Clinical Diagnosis |
An important diagnostic problem is distinguishing between viral and bacterial rhinosinusitis (i.e microbiological diagnosis) and thus identifying patients for whom antimicrobial therapy is likely to be beneficial. Because viral rhinosinusitis is a self-limiting condition, the chronology of infection is important. Acute rhinosinusitis is defined as2: Major criteria: Minor criteria: Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is suspected with worsening symptoms after 5-days (having initial improved) OR persistent symptoms 10 days after onset. History Some clinical findings have a stronger association with acute bacterial infection such as purulent secretions (persisting or recurring), dental pain, and pain bending forward, but the specificity of these is generally poor - ranging between 76 and 93%4. [Evidence level B] In adults, the duration of symptoms is important in distinguishing a viral and bacterial aetiology because viral infections are self-limiting and usually have resolved or are improving within 10 days. Worsening symptoms after 5 days of a common cold, after initial improvement, or persistent symptoms 10 days after onset associated with purulent nasal discharge2. [Evidence level B] There are no clinical features that reliably distinguish between different types of pathogen or different species of bacterial pathogen. Examination Anterior rhinoscopy (with an auroscope) can confirm purulent nasal discharge. Any facial swelling / erythema over the maxilla or frontal sinus should be noted. All but the sphenoidal sinuses can be palpated for tenderness: -Frontal sinus - press upward beneath the medial side of the supraorbital ridge. Signs of orbital or intracranial complication should be excluded. |
Investigation |
A raised white cell count or CRP lends support to an infective aetiology but is neither sensitive nor specific. Recommendation: Baseline FBC and U&E for patients admitted to hospital for intravenous antimicrobial therapy. [Evidence level D] Maxillary sinus puncture and culture of the aspirate provides optimal material for microbiological investigation and has therapeutic value. The invasive nature of this investigation and the recommended expertise required means that it is not as a routine for acute community-acquired sinusitis. Recommendation: Routine maxillary sinus puncture is not indicated but, whenever maxillary sinus puncture is undertaken by ENT surgeons, samples of pus should be sent for microbiological investigation. [Evidence level B] Endoscopically-directed middle meatal pus sampling is less invasive than maxillary sinus puncture and can provide useful microbiological information. Recommendation: Endoscopically-directed middle meatal sampling is recommended for persisting or complicated sinusitis.1, 2 [Evidence level B] Recommendation: CT scanning of the paranasal sinuses with contrast is necessary when intracranial or orbital complications are suspected. 2, 7 [Evidence level A] Recommendation: Routine radiographic imaging for patients with acute community-acquired rhinosinusitis is not recommended. 2, 7 [Evidence level A] |
Treatment | |
Non-Antimicrobial Treatment | |
Recommendation: Simple analgesia should be given for symptom control or mild pain and fever7. [Evidence level C]. Recommendation: Topical intranasal steroids (mometasone furoate 50micrograms 2 sprays to each nostril every 12 hours) have successfully been used as monotherapy and also combined with antibiotics in the treatment of non severe acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Treatment is continued for 10 days8, 9. [Evidence level A] Recommendation: Decongestant nasal drops (ephedrine 0.5% two drops to each nostril every 8 hours) may be administered to decrease congestion at the osteomeatal complex for 5 days, but evidence to support their efficacy is not available10, 11. [Evidence level D] Recommendation: Nasal douching with sinurinse (Neilmed) or a mixture of sodium and bicarbonate may help to remove purulent secretions12. [Evidence level D]
Patients with sinus symptoms are frequently over-treated with antimicrobials5. There is a general view that antimicrobial therapy should be reserved for patients with a high likelihood of bacterial infection according to diagnostic criteria outlined above. See Algorithm. Prior antimicrobial treatment and severity of illness are important considerations in the choice of antimicrobial therapy. A recent systematic review of randomised controlled trials of treatment regimens for radiologically confirmed maxillary sinusitis in ambulatory patients found that antimicrobial therapy with Amoxicillin The same systematic review found no difference in cure rates between penicillins and macrolides, quinolones, tetracyclines or cephalosporins. Similarly amoxicillin-clavulanate produced equivalent cure rates to cephalosporins and macrolides but with a worse side-effect profile. It is noteworthy that a high proportion of patients in the placebo arms of these well-conducted trials had spontaneous resolution of their symptoms6. The increasing prevalence of Clostridium difficile disease and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections means that cephalosporins and quinolones should not be used as first line agents where there is an effective, safe alternative. |
|
Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment | |
Recommendation: Acute rhinosinusitis in patients deemed well enough to be treated in the community may benefit from oral Amoxicillin Recommendation: Acute rhinosinusitis in ambulatory patients with a true penicillin allergy may benefit from Clarithromycin There is a paucity of data pertaining to sinusitis, associated with sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock and serious complications (cavernous sinus thrombosis, orbital cellulitis). The severely ill patient with acute sinusitis may benefit from endoscopic middle meatal sampling or invasive sinus puncture to identify the pathogen followed by broad spectrum empirical antimicrobial cover2. Among antimicrobials with the highest cure rates (90-92%) high-dose Co-amoxiclav Recommendation: Patients with symptoms/signs of rhinosinusitis who have severe infection (MEWS≥5) or judged to require IV inpatient therapy should be treated with Co-amoxiclav Recommendation: Patients with a true penicillin allergy should be treated with 1st line Linezolid *Linezolid |
|
Directed Antimicrobial Treatment (when microbiology results are known) | |
When middle meatal or sinus samples have been collected, review empirical antimicrobial therapy with culture results and amend to the most narrow spectrum antimicrobial available e.g. use Flucloxacillin |
|
Switch to oral agent(s) | |
Patients with acute community acquired bacterial sinusitis can be switched to oral antimicrobials as soon as they are clinically improving and fulfil criteria set out on the oral switch guideline. Patients with complicated sinusitis are likely to need a longer duration of IV antimicrobials and this should be determined on a case-by-case-basis and in consultation with microbiology. |
|
Treatment Algorithm | |
|
|
Treatment Failure | |
If a patient is not responding to antimicrobial therapy as expected, consider invasive sampling for microbiology and review antimicrobial therapy in consultation with microbiology. |
Provenance
Record: | 1726 |
Objective: |
To improve and standardise the diagnosis and management of acute and uncomplicated community-acquired rhinosinusitis in adults. |
Clinical condition: | Community-acquired rhinosinusitis |
Target patient group: | Acute uncomplicated bacterial rhinosinusitis |
Target professional group(s): | Primary Care Doctors Secondary Care Doctors |
Adapted from: |
Evidence base
- Balk EM, Zucker DR, Engels EA, Wong JB, Williams JW, Jr., Lau J. Strategies for diagnosing and treating suspected acute bacterial sinusitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2001 October;16(10):701-11.
- Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J. [European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps group]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008 April;43(4):317-20.
- Gwaltney JM. Sinusitis. Mandell,Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6 ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 772-83.
- Benninger MS, Sedory Holzer SE, Lau J. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial rhinosinusitis: summary of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research evidence-based report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000 January;122(1):1-7.
- NICE. Respiratory tract infections: antibiotic prescribing. Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care (NICE guideline). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008.
- Falagas ME, Giannopoulou KP, Vardakas KZ, Dimopoulos G, Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of antibiotics with placebo for treatment of acute sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis 2008 September;8(9):543-52.
- Ah-See KW, Evans AS. Sinusitis and its management. BMJ 2007 February 17;334(7589):358-61.
- Zalmanovici A, Yaphe J. Steroids for acute sinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):CD005149.
- Meltzer EO, Teper A, Danzig M. Intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2008 April;8(2):133-8.
- Taverner D, Latte GJ. Nasal decongestants for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD001953.
- Latte J, Taverner D, Slobodian P, Shakib S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pseudoephedrine in coryza. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2004 July;31(7):429-32.
- Harvey R, Hannan SA, Badia L, Scadding G. Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3):CD006394.
- hovuo-Saloranta A, Borisenko OV, Kovanen N, Varonen H, Rautakorpi UM, Williams JW, Jr. et al. Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(2):CD000243.
- Arroll B, Kenealy T. Are antibiotics effective for acute purulent rhinitis? Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo controlled randomised trials. BMJ 2006 August 5;333(7562):279.
- Arroll B, Kenealy T, Falloon K. Are antibiotics indicated as an initial treatment for patients with acute upper respiratory tract infections? A review. N Z Med J 2008 October 17;121(1284):64-70.
Evidence levels:
A. Meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials/systematic reviews of RCTs
B. Robust experimental or observational studies
C. Expert consensus.
D. Leeds consensus
Approved By
Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group
Document history
LHP version 1.0
Related information
Not supplied
Equity and Diversity
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is committed to ensuring that the way that we provide services and the way we recruit and treat staff reflects individual needs, promotes equality and does not discriminate unfairly against any particular individual or group.