ENT Surgery - Guideline for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis |
Publication: 01/01/2009 |
Next review: 09/03/2025 |
Clinical Guideline |
CURRENT |
ID: 1467 |
Approved By: Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group |
Copyright© Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 2022 |
This Clinical Guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals within Leeds unless otherwise stated. |
GUIDELINE FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS DURING ENT SURGERY
RECOMMENDED ROUTINE PROPHYLAXIS OPTIONS
For many ENT procedures there is no evidence that antimicrobial prophylaxis is of benefit to patients and its use is therefore not recommended. These guidelines should be applicable to the majority of patients but where the recommendations in these guidelines do not seem appropriate for a particular patient, the surgeon is advised to discuss the case with a Microbiologist
Procedure or situation | Antimicrobial dose/route |
|
Routine |
MRSA Risk and/or penicillin allergy |
|
Routine Ear surgery |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Complex Ear Surgery |
Co-Amoxiclav 1.2g IV single dose |
Teicoplanin 400mg IV single dose |
Routine nose, sinus and endoscopic sinus surgery or nasendoscopy |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Complex septorhinoplasty |
Co-Amoxiclav 1.2g IV single dose |
Teicoplanin 400mg IV single dose |
Tonsillectomy |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Adenoidectomy |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Grommet insertion (if bleeding or purulence present) |
Topical framycetin sulphate single dose |
Topical framycetin sulphate single dose |
Head and Neck surgery (clean, benign lesion) |
Not recommended |
Not recommended |
Head and neck surgery (malignant lesions, neck dissection, contaminated) |
Co-Amoxiclav 1.2g IV single dose and two further doses 8 hours apart |
Teicoplanin 400mg IV single dose |
Endocarditis risk1 |
Only if active infection at site of operation: Discuss with Microbiology |
Only if active infection at site of operation: Discuss with Microbiology |
FOOTNOTES
- Specific prophylaxis for patients at increased risk of developing endocarditis is no longer recommended. However, localised infections in patients at increased risk of endocarditis should be investigated (with microbiological sampling as appropriate) and treated promptly. If a patient at increased risk of endocarditis has active infection they should ideally be commenced on appropriate antimicrobial therapy prior to an ENT procedure at the site of infection.
|
Provenance
Record: | 1467 |
Objective: | The aim of antimicrobial prophylaxis in ENT surgery is a reduction in surgical site infection. |
Clinical condition: | Antimicrobial prophylaxis during ENT surgery |
Target patient group: | Adults |
Target professional group(s): | Secondary Care Doctors Pharmacists |
Adapted from: |
Evidence base
- Verschuur HP, de Wever WW, van Benthem PP. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean and clean-contaminated ear surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2004(3):CD003996.
- Annys E, Jorissen M. Short term effects of antibiotics (Zinnat) after endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2000;54(1):23-8.
- Andrews PJ, East CA, Jayaraj SM, Badia L, Panagamuwa C, Harding L. Prophylactic vs postoperative antibiotic use in complex septorhinoplasty surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial comparing efficacy. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;8(2):84-7.
- Sanchez-Carrion S, Prim MP, De Diego JI, Sastre N, Pena-Garcia P. Utility of prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric adenoidectomy. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2006 Jul;70(7):1275-81.
- Kocaturk S, Yardimci S, Yildirim A, Incesulu A. Preventive therapy for postoperative purulent otorrhea after ventilation tube insertion. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):123-7.
- Nawasreh O, Al-Wedyan IA. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin drops after tympanostomy tube insertion. Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1):38-40.
- Zipfel TE, Wood WE, Street DF, Wulffman J, Tipirneni A, Frey C, et al. The effect of topical ciprofloxacin on postoperative otorrhea after tympanostomy tube insertion. Am J Otol. 1999 Jul;20(4):416-20.
- Becker GD, Parell GJ. Cefazolin prophylaxis in head and neck cancer surgery. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1979 Mar-Apr;88(2 Pt 1):183-6.
- Dor P, Klastersky J. Prophylactic antibiotics in oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal surgery for cancer: (a double-blind study). The Laryngoscope. 1973 Dec;83(12):1992-8.
- Johnson JT, Myers EN, Thearle PB, Sigler BA, Schramm VL, Jr. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for contaminated head and neck surgery. The Laryngoscope. 1984 Jan;94(1):46-51.
- Johnson JT, Yu VL, Myers EN, Muder RR, Thearle PB, Diven WF. Efficacy of two third-generation cephalosporins in prophylaxis for head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984 Apr;110(4):224-7.
- Velanovich V. A meta-analysis of prophylactic antibiotics in head and neck surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Mar;87(3):429-34; discussion 35.
- Coskun H, Erisen L, Basut O. Factors affecting wound infection rates in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Sep;123(3):328-33.
- Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment Clinical guideline [CG74] Published date: October 2008 Last updated: February 2017
- SIGN. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network Publication Number 104. Edinburgh; 2008 update April 2014.
- Priyesh Patel, Asitha Jayawardena, Rachel Walden, Edward Penn, David Francis, Evidence-Based Use of Perioperative Antibiotics in OtolaryngologyOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2018, Vol. 158(5) 783–800
Approved By
Improving Antimicrobial Prescribing Group
Document history
LHP version 2.0
Related information
Not supplied
Equity and Diversity
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is committed to ensuring that the way that we provide services and the way we recruit and treat staff reflects individual needs, promotes equality and does not discriminate unfairly against any particular individual or group.